The first DC-3 took to the air in 1935 and over 80 years later, about 800 are still going worldwide. Last week’s tragic crash marks the end of an era for these aviation workhorses.
My first flight in a Douglas DC-3 was in the ‘bucket seat’. Which turned to be an actual upturned bucket. It was in fact the pilot’s fishing bucket, as he fully intended to catch pavón – peacock bass – in some tropical river close to our destination. There were no spare seats in the cockpit and the cargo area was full. So, the bucket it was.
But what a seat: perched behind the captain and co-pilot, I had a grandstand view of the vast Amazon jungle and the oily black Rio Negro as we skimmed over endless trees to a surprisingly smooth landing on a muddy strip.
This particular plane was built in 1943 and had seen action in Europe, the US and Canada before heading south to join Colombia’s DC-3 fleet in the 1970s. The fact that it was still making daily runs around the eastern plains was remarkable for such a venerable work of engineering, especially one defying the laws of gravity. I doubt I would ride in a car or bus built seven decades ago.
Would Colombia’s aviation workhorses ever retire? I asked the pilot. “Not as long as we can keep holding them together,” he said.
But now their time is up. Last week’s tragic Aero Laser crash of a DC-3 in Meta, with 14 passengers and crew killed, will surely put these old birds to bed.
For local pilots and
In 2018 an estimated 600 (no-one knows for sure) were still flying worldwide, many in air shows and for joy rides.
But the eventual journey was worth it, with the throbbing radial Pratt and Whitney engines, the original 1930s instrument panels, and a grizzled mechanic wandering around with an oil can. It pitched you back to an era when flying was fun.
Was it ever safe?
It’s hard to get stats on the number of DC-3s operating in Colombia, though five years ago there were around 30, according to Al Jazeera. But we do have data on crashes. A Wikipedia list based on official accident reports records 60 incidents globally in the last two decades, of which a third were in Colombia. Of these, eight had fatalities totalling 42 deaths, including last week’s losses on a flight from San José de Guaviare to Villavicencio.
The stats are hard to interpret without wider context. How many DC-3s actually flew? And how often? But we can guess the Colombian-based planes were working longer and harder than elsewhere. And given the terrain here – mountain foothills, tracts of jungle with tropical weather and landing on muddy dirt strips – it’s perhaps a miracle there were not more accidents.
And the fact that many planes were badly pranged – ‘destroyed by fire’, ‘crashed into a tree’ or ‘landed in a rice field’ – but frequently ‘all on board survived’ suggests they had a charmed life.
The crash stats do reveal one worrying trend: in the aftermath ‘substantially damaged’ Colombian DC-3s were ‘put back into service’. So not only were you flying around in a plane fabricated before your grandfather was born, but it was also a crash repair.
And not easy to repair. Spare parts for such old planes were scarce, according to a 2015 documentary on Al Jazeera, ‘The Daredevil Pilots of Colombia’, and mechanical problems played a big part in frequent downtime of the DC-3s in Villavicencio. Engine failure was being given as the ‘probable cause’ of last week’s fatal DC-3 crash and burn near San Carlos de Guaroa in Meta.
What happens now? It’s likely the DC-3s will disappear from Colombia’s skies and be replaced by newer planes, such as the Antonovs already plying some jungle routes (though these 1970s Soviet cargo planes are hardly spring chickens either).
When they do go, we’ll miss the old DC-3s. I’m no plane buff, but I always admired these relics and their place in history. You could say they were on my bucket list. Though I never expected to experience them in Colombia, sitting on a bucket.
- For more information see Al Jazeera’s documentary ‘Risking it All – The Daredevil Pilots of Colombia’.